Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 23:59

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
‘How To Train Your Dragon’ Flying In With $200M+ Worldwide Bow – International Box Office - Deadline
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Amazon launches new R&D group focused on agentic AI and robotics - TechCrunch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Moons of Uranus surprise scientists in Hubble study - Phys.org
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
We've finally slowed the surge in overdose deaths. The Trump admin may undo all of it - Salon.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear: